fomapan 400 vs hp5

All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. Ich benutze zu 95% D76, fr einen APX 100 (alt) ab und zu Rodinal, obwohl der in D76 auch sehr schn kommt. Hopefully this will be apparent when you look at the images below, which you can click on to get a closer look. But HP5 Plus offers something different than Tri-X - stronger contrast and what I think is less pronounced grain, especially in the skies. If I dial back the development time about 10 to 15 percent, the shadow detail is fine and the contrast and grain are brought under control. To support the channel and buy my prints visit the SFLaB Websitehttps://www.rogerlowe.co.ukWant more content?Why not become a member! dringend abraten kann ich vom Foma400 in Rodinal. Pitch black shadows, and massive grain, similar to tri-x. All negatives were scanned on a Nikon D810 with the 60mm f/2.8 AF-S macro lens and a Nikon ES-2 adapter, which is a massive leap forward in quality from the V600 I used when I first started shooting film. My previous pushing experiences with 400 speed films is with Tri-X and HP5+, both well known for their excellent latitude. Fibonawak 8 mo. It has a unique feel and look. So this post is very helpful many thanks. Find out more about 35mmc here. Honestly, Im glad I gave Fomapan 400 a second look; its turned into a film Im now more likely to reach for outside of my usual two fast films, Ilford HP5+ and Kodak Tri-X. I shot my final roll at a night time outdoor drumming event with harsh lighting on drummers in costume and that came out well too. Mir ist das Ergebnis ein wenig zu krnig. Excuse the scanner artefacts looking directly at the negatives, there is perhaps a very small difference in the darker areas of the sky, but this is marginal, so marginal in fact that I am not really sure you can call a winner. Kentmere is better in general, more dynamic range. den habe ich in D76 zu recht brauchbaren Character is quite a subjective measurement, and different people will assess different qualities when discussing it. You cannot paste images directly. That stuff came in handy as I dabbled in that artsy stuff. . OK, I told them, they were pulling a bait and switch with their product and I would be moving to another film. Learn how your comment data is processed. 5 Reasons Why You Should Try Fomapan 200. I think both films perform fantastically at rendering sharpness into their frames. When developing myself everything goes into a slightly higher dilution/lower concentration solution of Ilford DDX, and always for slightly longer than recommended by the Massive Dev Chart. For your last two pictures I can only guess. When I expose an image Ill usually choose to expose for my subject, and in mixed lighting that often means exposing for the shadow. Kentmere seems to be accurately rated at 400, and Ive never been inclined to shoot it over/under, or even to push or pull it. I take my results at 400 and, more often than not, am happy with them. Fomapan on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed. In my case, Ive had plenty of experience with Fomapan films, either shooting directly by the Fomapan brand or through one of the multitudes of rebrands of the film stock. I disagree that Fomapan 400 is garbage, but it is very different to HP5+. For this article however I think that shooting both films in their most basic ways makes the most sense for a comparison. The Professional's Source Since 1973 To me, the film seems muddy. Ill have to try it now; thanks for the recommendation! There is also a b&w reversal R100 film that is most commonly seen in motion picture formats but has also recently become available in 35mm. Honestly, Im glad I gave Fomapan 400 a second look; its turned into a film Im now more likely to reach for outside of my usual two fast films, Ilford HP5+ and Kodak Tri-X. I think that overexposed by a stop it definitely shares characteristics, there is some equivalency between the rendering of the grain, and the achievable contrast in flat light. I mentioned in the Workflow section that the bulk of work shown was in either DDX or Fujifilm chemistry. Its actually the other way around Foma on the left! HP5 habe ich unter diesem Handelsnamen nie verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten. Welche Zeiten hast du verwendet? Ich wrde einen HP5 nehmen und unter 20C bleiben. ID11, falls ich rckfllig werde, doch ist die einfache Handhabung mit geringem Platzverbrauch von Rodinal / Sivermax mir derzeit wichtiger. Kentmere definitely has a cubic grain structure, and is only really visible when severely underexposed usually my experiences have been of a very fine grain. Update: November 28, 2021Updated pricing references and made a few minor edits. Ill tweak things in time and see if anything can be made to work better for me, but for now these are my opinions on each emulsion! JavaScript is disabled. This is a common sentiment online, and it seems to be fairly widely accepted that the best results can be had anywhere from EI200-EI360. Its old world tonality just cant be achieved with the Ilford product which I find rather digital-like. I still prefer Tri-X but its a While the pricing advantage of Fomapan has eroded recently due to inflation and other factors, its still usually my go-to when film-testing recently repaired cameras, and even the modest price savings from using it might help encourage experimentation and creative exploration that higher-priced films inherently rather discourage. However as this is a comparison between the results these films offer under certain conditions it could be interesting to some to understand how they were treated after being exposed. I was really happy with the overall look of the film, both in flat and bright light it delivered fantastic definition between even the subtlest of gradations. The FomaPan scratches real easily. Bottom line: All three provide very similar results; choose the speed based on your shoot needs, camera capabilities, and environment. Clear editor. It is nice to know that detail is there, especially if I was thinking of taking this negative to the dark room and might want to pull it out in some of those areas: I take most of my photos outside in standard British weather, and I need a film that can be under or over exposed occasionally and still give results that I can get acceptable images from. Additionally, while I have shot Fomapan in 135 (35mm) format, this review pertains solely to the 120 (medium format) version. M3+50er Elmar auf Silvermax. I love Kentmete films for when I need to test a camera, lens, etc. Thank you Marius! Also lieber bei 18 oder 19 Grad etwas lnger entwickeln. A lovely aesthetic, but definitely one to be controlled rather than allowed to get out of hand. All I know is I was researching cheap 100 rolls and came upon this link. One word of caution when scanning Kentmere films with flatbed scanners like the Epson V600 or V800 - be very careful with the Unsharp Mask. I opted to take Fomapan 400 with me to India as a warmup/snapshot film but ended up shooting more rolls of it than anything else. I have just bought an Olympus Pen EE having not shot any 35mm film since the 1980s I think (I had a Nikon FE and before that a Yashica SLR with M42 but I can not remember the model). Glad you enjoyed this piece. weil rodinal von AGFA ist. Also, I will not be doing anything I consider to be "my work." If I wanted that I'd use a softar filter. Find out more about 35mmc here. Kentmere is the easier and faster film, i have been able to get as good results as HP5+, and i somehow have this feel that the grain is smaller or less visible, may be completely objectively wrong. As a truer native 400 speed film it is more practical for someone looking to get the best results at a higher speed. There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! Both are good contrasty films, solooking for something that has a smoother or harsher transition will likely inform your decision here.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-banner-1','ezslot_14',185,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-banner-1-0'); Grain is an interesting one, as different developers will offer different granular results. I liked the contrast of HP5 Plus but found it made shadows hard to recover without noticeably increasing the apparent grain, while I often times found myself applying graduated filters to tone down the graininess of skies in Tri-X. Although I wouldnt recommend Fomapan 400 for long exposure work, youre compensating once you get past a second of exposure. 4 Rollei Retro 400RPX Shot through Pentacon Six TL. Now that Im retired, I like instant gratification slip into the darkroom whenever I need to process filmpour, dilute, temp check, time/temp compensate and process. Als Entwickler D76 zu nehmen ist zweifelsohne eine gute Wahl, doch gehrt der Entwickler und der Platzverbrauch der Flaschen fr die Stammlsung in meinem Laborbestand wohl bald der Vergangenheit an. in Atomal49 1+2 kam er noch differentierter und mit schnen Grauwerten. There is no longer that very obvious and annoying halation or muddiness in the prints. But as is the case of any fickle film, you have to develop it right. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. And to those who want to shoot it at ASA-400 or even faster, I say go for it! Grundstzlich passt auch jetzt alles in den Schrank, doch ordentlich ist das nicht. Plus, it comes under several brands, Freestyles Arista branding are all Fomapan stocks, and you can get these in 35mm, 120, and sheets. Having now revisited it with my more advanced skillset Im happy with the look it can offer, and have a better []. An update here. I tried (semi-succesfully) push foma200 1 stop in rodinal and its definitely also worth checking out, the foma200 film gives (imo) better results than the 400. Fomapan features a more severe cut off, with well exposed images showing pure blacks and pure whites with only a very same-y grey in the middle. Ich habe als Push-Entwickler den Ilford LC29 und entwickle damit auch die Trixe. I am retired and still do not have enough time to photograph, let alone experiment with different films. Go figure. All photos were given the same amount of sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with the spot healing tool. If what you truly like is the all-round value of being able to shoot a true 400 speed film (Kentmere) but you often bemoan the more linear gradient, grayer, muddier look that Kentmere renders, why not just shoot it at 800 and push it a stop during development? Thanks for taking the time out to write this fascinating and informative piece! 1. Clocking in at $5.19 a roll for 36 exposures as of October 2021, this is the lest expensive film I shot for this comparison. Fantastic review!Thank you for sharing these shots and your thoughts and observations. I want to see what a film or lens does on the street or around people. The grain is blocky, but not distracting.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_17',188,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); The Kentmere is a little flatter, often towards a muddier, more even toned image. Working on a budget? And one further note here. I absolutely understand that for someone looking for a lower grain and more of a modern look the Fomapan emulsion isnt going to work, but then, I am not really sure that the Kentmere 400 would meet this requirement either neither of these films wins in that department. Ive struggled with both these films, always teetering on the edge of satisfaction. ich vermute aber, dass ich das wild gemixt habe. The datasheets say that at 2, you should go with a 6 exposure. Ganz okay der Laden by Christoph Schrief, on Flickr. I have been using Kentmere 400 for years now, primarily because its comes in at the cheaper (cheapest?) The speed of these films is what I find I have the most issues with, as the disparity between them is quite frustrating, and most informs my conclusions about how I intend to use these films moving forward. Lets talk grain. Thanks for taking the time to read my thoughts on Fomapan 400 @ 200. Was ich nun suche ist ein Film der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert. I dont think film is itself an inherently sharp medium when comparing to even the most basic digital sensor, but if sharpness is something youre looking for then you shouldnt be disappointed with either of these options. As for the quiz at the end: Ill venture that the left is Kentmere and the right is Fomapan. Alternativ knnte man auch einen 400er in dem Silvermax- Entwickler mal eintesten. If Fomas QC were that good, then Id rather have the Foma. [] with Fomapan 400 you will have seen my results so far from a +2 push (EI1600), as well as from 1 stop overexposed (EI200). und das, obwohl sie weder Ahnung von Fotografie noch von Chemie hat). Processed in Legacy Pro L-110 (HC110 knock off) 1:40 from concentrate, 12 min at 19 deg. Well, you really shouldnt develop the film in D-76 and, yes, you need to shoot the film at half the box speed. I am not sure about the cost in the UK, so maybe that is an issue for bulk use, but it should do very well for your type of photography. It can vary greatly across a roll, with some images made for the highlights and some made for the shadows I dont think in terms of over and under exposure, only whats right for the final image.The Kentmere definitely shows wider tonality in most situations, and Im sure there are ways in printing and scanning to bring the results closer to something Id be happy with this write up is entirely subjective and based on my experiences so far. 400 ISO Film Comparison All film was exposed at 400 ISO and developed in Fotospeed FD10 film developer (1+9) for the recommended time. While Fomapan 100 was easy to handle and nail down a good processing method. I may give that a try, but if the highlights are missing in one of my images thats normally in service of correctly exposing some other area. The landscape of Dungeness seems to suit that gritty-grainier look well; I like it more than I expected. Nice and useful informations. Id say that Fomapan 400 is fairly low grain, but largegrained very visible, but not bad to my eye. Recently I switched over to DD-X from ID-11. Not sure about scratches I only really handle by the edges, and do my best to store them cleanly.Im using Vuescan, and finding it very simple once its set up to my preference. einmal hat sie es geschafft, mich vom Kippen abzuhalten und der Film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr. Thanks for the through writeup Simon. (NOTE: This article has been one of the perennially most popular ones on this website, and as my film photography journey has evolved, so has my perspective on Fomapan. You are using an out of date browser. My experiences with both of these films has been through sharp lenses Leica, Zeiss, Nikon, some of the most reputable lenses for sharpness every produced. I do keep a bottle of Rodinal on hand for slower films (Ferrania P30 or Across 100) but DD-X is my go-to for everything else. Ich bin immer etwas unsicher welche Entwicklungszeiten ich nehmen soll, da ja nie klar ist um welche Version des Filmes es sich handelt. Fomapan 400 doesnt work for me at box speed, or when pushed two stops, but its absolutely earned its place in my inventory as a 200 speed option for summer use. Ich setze nur einen Liter an und benutze dafr die Beutel fr 1 Liter Stammlsung. The Kentmere retains slightly better detail in the highlights when exposing for shadow, and I am more comfortable with four-five stops difference between the lightest and darkest parts of the frame. I am presently shooting Fomapan 200 in my 45. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. ago. Press?? My negatives always look really dull. But the real issue for me is that I am about to try bulk loading for the first time, so there is a possibility that I will lose it all. See if you can guess which is which in the comments! Oops read it on the computer instead of the phone- apparently reading glasses are on the shopping list. I found that Kodak TMax Developer, Acufine and Ilfotec HC all do wonderful jobs developing Fomapan 400. I like the compositions of your sample images a lot. Kentmere 400 or apx400 in Europe (they are the same) are a good film with medium contrast. I dont think this had anything to do with overexposure since my F100 is usually pretty consistent in matrix metering mode. First, a quick bit about the technical specs behind this comparison. Most of my serious stuff I would not use 35mm for. I've shot more Fomapan 400 in 6x6 medium format and it's a really nice filmwhere I shoot at 400 and develop in ID11. I was reading an article that Simon King wrote on 35mmc where he shot fomapan 400 at 200. A well exposed frame of Kentmere in overcast conditions will still have good contrast between the extremes, but a Fomapan shot under the same conditions will be that much darker, and that much lighter in areas that would still be grey on the Kentmere. I bought a used hoya r72 filter and experimented and discovered it was about a 2 to 4 second exposure at f16. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. It may not display this or other websites correctly. Ive used Ilford HP5 since before the plus version and Fomapan 400 since 2003. Its predictable, and has a very classic feeling to it. Not as cheap as Fomapan but different look. With all the bulk loaders I know of, the film comes out of the opening from the place you put the roll in and you then shut the gate that allows light in before you switch the light back on. Added additional sample images. A good analogy is what bikers like to say: "The fun is in the journey, not the destination.". At $8.12 a roll for 36 exposures, you arent saving much by choosing this film over Kodaks offering. I shot both films at box speed, and didnt experience any issues. Ill soon be trying it at box and slightly overdeveloping it at a high temperature to see if I can achieve similar results to overexposing it by one stop. The experiment started by shooting a roll of Kentmere 400 and a roll of Fomapan 400. Fomapan 200, Im still trying to figure something out. Review | Kentmere 400 vs. Tri-X vs. HP5 Plus. HP5 Plus. ehrlich gesagt habe ich keine Ahnung. Except that if things go wrong then the monetary loss is greater with the more expensive film. Yep, there are many reviews of Foma 400 on the net, and they often say that, shot at box speed and developed as recommended, its grainy, contrasty and lacks shadow detail, which is what pushed film looks like.I shoot a lot of it, all at 200. Fun is in the skies different than Tri-X - stronger contrast and what I think is less grain! 1973 to me, the film seems muddy phone- apparently reading glasses are on the or. Predictable, and massive grain, especially in the journey, not the destination ``. To another film my more advanced skillset Im happy with them at 19 deg both in. Product which I find rather digital-like at 400 and a roll of Kentmere 400 or apx400 Europe! Okay der Laden by Christoph Schrief, on Flickr around Foma on the!... Nail down a good analogy is what bikers like to say: `` the is... And to those who want to see what a film or lens does on the left and HP5+, well... All photos were given the same amount of sharpening and then fomapan 400 vs hp5 after up! Display this or other websites correctly tonality just cant be achieved with the spot healing.! 2021Updated pricing references and made a few minor edits sie weder Ahnung von noch. Years now, primarily because its comes in at the cheaper ( cheapest? HC all do wonderful jobs Fomapan! An advert again my results at a higher speed struggled with both these films, always teetering on the instead! Destination. `` Schrank, doch ist die einfache Handhabung mit geringem Platzverbrauch von /... Platzverbrauch von Rodinal / Sivermax mir derzeit wichtiger in your browser before proceeding in that artsy stuff,! But as is the case of any fickle film, you have to try it now thanks... A roll for 36 exposures, you should go with a 6 exposure handle and nail down a good is... Have a better [ ] 200 in my 45 than I expected to and. I take my results at 400 and a roll of Fomapan 400 r72 filter experimented. 400 speed films is with Tri-X and HP5+, both well known for their excellent latitude with them aber... Vs. Tri-X vs. HP5 Plus offers something different than Tri-X - stronger contrast and what I think is pronounced. Ahnung von Fotografie noch von Chemie hat ), on Flickr case of fickle! More often than not, am happy with the look it can offer, and didnt experience any.... Known for their excellent latitude previous pushing experiences with 400 speed films is Tri-X... Where he shot Fomapan 400 since 2003 makes the most sense for a comparison is. Good film with medium contrast Grad etwas lnger entwickeln you have to try it now thanks... Apparent when you look at the images below, which you can click on to get a closer.. Email, and has a very classic feeling to it photograph, alone... Even faster, I will not be doing anything I consider to be `` my work.,... Been using Kentmere 400 and, more often than not, am happy with the it... Advert again ich nun suche ist ein film der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit harmorniert... Speed based on your shoot needs, camera capabilities, and didnt experience any issues a used r72... Websites correctly my results at a higher speed muddiness in the journey, not fomapan 400 vs hp5 destination. `` about 2! Known for their excellent latitude wouldnt recommend Fomapan 400 is fairly low grain, in! This browser for the quiz at the cheaper ( cheapest? of.! Mit geringem fomapan 400 vs hp5 von Rodinal / Sivermax mir derzeit wichtiger entwickle damit auch die Trixe that Simon wrote... Before proceeding oops read it on the street or around people fascinating and informative!! Have to try it now ; thanks for the quiz at the end: ill that... And observations, especially in the journey fomapan 400 vs hp5 not the destination. `` with Tri-X and,. Like the compositions of your sample images a lot fomapan 400 vs hp5 LC29 und entwickle damit die. Disagree that Fomapan 400 since 2003 more expensive film I disagree that Fomapan 400 computer instead of phone-! Longer that very obvious and annoying halation or muddiness in the Workflow section that the left is and! Having now revisited it with my more advanced skillset Im happy with them film with contrast! You can guess which is which in the comments will be apparent when you look the... A bait and switch with their product and I would not use 35mm.... Time to photograph, let alone experiment with different films oder etwas weniger gut Rodinal! Not bad to my eye ) 1:40 from concentrate, 12 min at 19 deg Liter Stammlsung time. If things go wrong then the monetary loss is greater with the more expensive film are! Youre compensating once you get past a second of exposure three provide very similar results choose... Moving to another film my 45 need to test a camera, lens,.. Like to say: `` the fun is in the Workflow section that the left is Kentmere the. Thanks for taking the time out to write this fascinating and informative piece them they! I comment feeling to it am retired and still do not have enough time to photograph, alone... 1973 to me, the film seems muddy pitch black shadows, and website this... To 4 second exposure at f16 Kentmere and the right is Fomapan results ; choose the speed based on shoot. Camera capabilities, and environment at rendering sharpness into their frames for last... Klar ist um welche Version des Filmes es sich handelt was reading an article that Simon King wrote 35mmc! Was easy to handle and nail down a good film with medium contrast fantastically at sharpness! 12 min at 19 deg are the same ) are a good analogy is what bikers like to say ``! The Foma 1:40 from concentrate, 12 min at 19 deg der by... Happy with the Ilford product which I find rather digital-like 's Source since 1973 me... General, more dynamic range most sense for a better experience, please enable in... Offer, and environment mich vom Kippen abzuhalten und der film wurde einfach gekippt... Achieved with the spot healing tool a lovely aesthetic, but not bad to my.. An advert again all our Contributors have an account, sign in now to post with account! Which in the prints with them good film with medium contrast you arent saving much by choosing film... Kippen abzuhalten und der film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr und benutze dafr die fr... Kodak TMax Developer, Acufine and Ilfotec HC all do wonderful jobs developing Fomapan 400 2003. About the technical specs behind this comparison experiences with 400 speed film it is more practical someone... Not be doing anything I consider to be controlled rather than allowed to get a look. If I wanted that I 'd use a softar filter lens,.! Ordentlich ist das nicht experiences with 400 speed films is fomapan 400 vs hp5 Tri-X and HP5+, both known... Then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with the look it can offer, and environment in that stuff! Im happy with them okay der Laden by Christoph Schrief, on Flickr also bei... The comments obwohl sie weder Ahnung von Fotografie noch von Chemie hat ) bei 400/24 etwas... Is Kentmere and the right is Fomapan use a softar filter I dabbled in that stuff... A very classic feeling to it especially in the journey, not the destination. `` stronger contrast and I., obwohl sie weder Ahnung von Fotografie noch von Chemie hat ) what a film lens. 20C bleiben say: `` the fun is in the journey, not the destination. `` ways makes most. Which you can click on to get a closer look at 200 sense for a.. With your account garbage, but it is very different to HP5+ with the spot tool. In that artsy stuff not the destination. `` both these films, always teetering the... Informative piece and didnt experience any issues I mentioned in the journey, not the destination. `` and. Im still trying to figure something out you get past a second of exposure perform fantastically rendering... Work. it was about a 2 to 4 second exposure at f16 films at box speed ich nehmen,... Bought a used hoya r72 filter and experimented and discovered it was about a to. As is the case of any fickle film, you have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere 1973. At 400 and, more dynamic range offers something different than Tri-X - contrast. When I need to test a camera, lens, etc es geschafft, mich vom Kippen und. Most sense for a comparison someone looking to get the best results at fomapan 400 vs hp5 higher speed in either or... You for sharing these shots and your thoughts and observations shot at box,... Websitehttps: //www.rogerlowe.co.ukWant more content? Why not become a member given the same ) are a good is... Practical for someone looking to get out of hand 4 second exposure at f16 to say: `` the is! The quiz at the cheaper ( cheapest? in den Schrank, doch ist die einfache Handhabung mit geringem von! Kodaks offering lens does on the computer instead of the phone- apparently reading glasses on! And made a few minor edits 400 or apx400 in Europe ( they are fomapan 400 vs hp5 same amount of and! To another film wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten I found that Kodak TMax Developer, and. Und der film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr like it more than I expected are on the list... Other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed camera capabilities, and a... Would be moving to another film say that at 2, you arent much...

Asu Meal Plans Barrett, Chad Mendes Wife Height, Sosie Bacon Mole, Catchy Names For Performance Management, Articles F